Relevant when…
You need explicit MCP and connected-agent assessment coverage.
This is editorial fit guidance based on public positioning. We have not independently tested this provider or confirmed availability.
What the provider documents
- Assessment scope
- AI agent testing · LLM application testing · MCP assessment · RAG security · Prompt injection · Tool misuse
- Engagement model
- Assessment service
- Deliverables
- Reproducible attacks, observed outcomes, fixes and control evaluations.
- Deployment
- Not published
- Pricing
- Not published
- Retesting
- A remediation retest is advertised; confirm eligibility, window and scenario coverage.
Source for documented facts: the provider’s official offering ↗. “Not published” means not recorded in the reviewed source, not that an option is unavailable.
Before you request a proposal
- Which MCP and agent-to-agent trust boundaries are in scope?
- What safeguards and environment access apply to the testing?
- Which system changes and scenarios are covered by the retest?
Ask the provider to put authorized systems, exclusions, evidence handling, timing and acceptance criteria in the written scope. Do not send credentials or vulnerability evidence through an initial inquiry.
Sources & verification
- OSec — official service information ↗
Supports the summary, service model, scope and recorded engagement facts above. Evidence status: provider-stated.