Relevant when…
You need the proposed assessment documented as a specific engagement with explicit exclusions.
This is editorial fit guidance based on public positioning. We have not independently tested this provider or confirmed availability.
What the provider documents
- Assessment scope
- AI agent testing · Prompt injection · Tool misuse
- Engagement model
- Assessment service
- Deliverables
- Written findings include evidence, severity reasoning and remediation direction, with a retest plan.
- Deployment
- Controlled non-production testing is described.
- Pricing
- Not published
- Retesting
- Retests are described; scope and support terms must be agreed.
Source for documented facts: the provider’s official offering ↗. “Not published” means not recorded in the reviewed source, not that an option is unavailable.
Before you request a proposal
- Which agent risks and tool permissions are excluded?
- What environment parity is needed?
- Which retest window and support terms apply?
Ask the provider to put authorized systems, exclusions, evidence handling, timing and acceptance criteria in the written scope. Do not send credentials or vulnerability evidence through an initial inquiry.
Sources & verification
- DeployOpen — official service information ↗
Supports the summary, service model, scope and recorded engagement facts above. Evidence status: provider-stated.