Relevant when…
You need agent behavior evaluated alongside web, API and cloud attack paths.
This is editorial fit guidance based on public positioning. We have not independently tested this provider or confirmed availability.
What the provider documents
- Assessment scope
- AI agent testing · LLM application testing · RAG security · Prompt injection · Tool misuse
- Engagement model
- Assessment service
- Deliverables
- Findings describe exploit paths, business impact and remediation, with a walkthrough.
- Deployment
- Not published
- Pricing
- Not published
- Retesting
- Remediation retesting is described; confirm inclusion and timing.
Source for documented facts: the provider’s official offering ↗. “Not published” means not recorded in the reviewed source, not that an option is unavailable.
Before you request a proposal
- Which agent permissions and connected actions are included?
- How will cross-layer exploit chains be demonstrated safely?
- Are the walkthrough and retest included in the quoted scope?
Ask the provider to put authorized systems, exclusions, evidence handling, timing and acceptance criteria in the written scope. Do not send credentials or vulnerability evidence through an initial inquiry.
Sources & verification
- Bishop Fox — official service information ↗
Supports the summary, service model, scope and recorded engagement facts above. Evidence status: provider-stated.